================
@@ -4837,6 +4837,21 @@ static void TryConstructorOrParenListInitialization(
TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, Args, DestType, DestType,
Sequence, /*IsListInit=*/false, IsAggrListInit);
+ // Try list initialization if this is HLSL.
+ if (S.getLangOpts().HLSL && Sequence.Failed()) {
+ InitListExpr *ILE = new (S.Context)
+ InitListExpr(S.getASTContext(), Args.front()->getBeginLoc(), Args,
+ Args.back()->getEndLoc());
+ ILE->setType(S.getASTContext().VoidTy);
+ Args[0] = ILE;
+ // Reset the sequence as normal.
+ Sequence.setSequenceKind(InitializationSequence::NormalSequence);
+ // We don't want the diagnostics to appear if list initialization fails.
+ Sema::TentativeAnalysisScope DisableDiag(S);
+ TryListInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, ILE, Sequence,
+ /*TreatUnavailableAsInvalid=*/true);
+ return;
+ }
----------------
s-perron wrote:
also, should we have a common function that both the assignment operator and
the initializer case call? Why don't we call HLSL().tryAggregateInitialization
from here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190089
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
