llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

For primitive array elements, we would accidentally activate the element and 
then immediate de-activate the array root, which is wrong.  Ignore the element 
from the beginning to the later check never even compares with the element.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191772.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp (+5) 
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp (+14) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp 
b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp
index 16c364d279020..a0a1c64bfd975 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Pointer.cpp
@@ -669,6 +669,11 @@ void Pointer::activate() const {
   };
 
   Pointer B = *this;
+  // Primitive array elements can't be activated individually, so
+  // look at the array root instead.
+  if (B.getFieldDesc()->isPrimitiveArray() && B.isArrayElement())
+    B = B.getArray();
+
   while (!B.isRoot() && B.inUnion()) {
     activate(B);
 
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp 
b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
index 6091ab5602121..0175d7cfac785 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/placement-new.cpp
@@ -539,3 +539,17 @@ namespace DirectBaseHasNoRecord {
   static_assert(test_multidim_single_start() == 13); // both-error {{not an 
integral constant expression}} \
                                                      // both-note {{in call 
to}}
 }
+
+namespace PrimArray {
+  constexpr int test_start_lifetime_array() {
+    struct S {
+      union { int storage[4]; };
+    };
+    S s;
+    s.storage[0] = 10;
+    ::new (&s.storage[0]) int(10);
+    ::new (&s.storage[1]) int(20);
+    return s.storage[0] + s.storage[1];
+  }
+  static_assert(test_start_lifetime_array() == 30);
+}

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191772
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to