AkashDeoNU wrote:

> Sorry, I may have misread the mask/maskz tests - as long as we have test 
> coverage for every intrinsic that's fine.
> 
> If you made the existing tests arguments more non-uniform you could actually 
> reduce the number of tests (if you look you have a lot more TEST_CONSTEXPR 
> tests than most intrinsics do) - since VNNI performs cross-element access its 
> useful to find bugs if you avoid the elements being all the same.

Great! I will incorporate those changes tonight, then re-request reviews. 
Thanks for the feedback. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190549
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to