================
@@ -10827,8 +10865,16 @@ DeclResult Sema::ActOnExplicitInstantiation(Scope *S,
return true;
}
- // FIXME: Create an ExplicitInstantiation node?
- return (Decl*) nullptr;
+ const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo *ArgsAsWritten = nullptr;
+ if (auto *VTSD = dyn_cast<VarTemplateSpecializationDecl>(Prev))
+ ArgsAsWritten = VTSD->getTemplateArgsAsWritten();
+ addExplicitInstantiationDecl(Context, CurContext, D.getCXXScopeSpec(),
Prev,
+ ExternLoc, TemplateLoc, SourceLocation(),
+ ArgsAsWritten, D.getIdentifierLoc(), T, TSK);
+ // Don't return the EID to the Parser — doing so would trigger
+ // unrelated semantic actions (e.g. access checks via
+ // FinalizeDeclaration).
+ return (Decl *)nullptr;
----------------
16bit-ykiko wrote:
However, I agree the current code is confusing, I'm just not sure what the best
fix is.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191658
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
