bjope added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:5888
def note_typecheck_assign_const : Note<
"%select{"
----------------
Shouldn't there be one more entry here as well?
(see comment about updating both err_typecheck_assign_const and
note_typecheck_assign_const when adding things to the enum at line 10181).
If I understand it correctly you never print notes for the new
NestedConstMember, so there isn't really a need for a fifth entry in the select
today.
But if someone adds new enum values later (putting them after NestedContMember)
then it might be nice if the size of this select matches with the old size of
the enum.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:10329
+ S.Diag(Field->getLocation(), diag::note_typecheck_assign_const)
+ << ConstMember << false /*non-static*/ << Field
+ << Field->getType() << Field->getSourceRange();
----------------
If adding a new entry to note_typecheck_assign_const (identical to the
ConstMember entry) then you can use NestedConstMember here. It would make it
possible to change the string for NestedConstMember notes without also changing
all ConstMember notes.
Now it kind of looks like an error that the error diagnostic is for a
NestedConstMember, but the note is about a ConstMember. That might confuse
someone, since it looks like a typo unless you know what is going on here.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37254
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
