zeyi2 wrote: > Since my patch fixes an additional missed case in dependent initializers, > would you prefer updating that existing entry rather than adding a separate > new note?
IMO you can just edit the existing entry (since the earlier PATCH didn't solve the issue) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/186953 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
