AaronBallman wrote: > I see four more core language papers adopted in february minutes: — > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3751.txt — > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3788.htm — > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3647.pdf — > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3648.pdf > > I don't necessarily argue that we need to list them, but would be nice to > know how you draw the line between what to list on the status page and what > to omit.
I only list papers which have normative impact and change the compiler, so that means I leave off purely editorial papers as well as library-only papers. All four of those you listed were ones I saw as well but they're editorial. I think the cleanup of atomics *might* have normative impact, but it is not intended to and so if that ends up mattering in the future, we'd add it to the list at that point. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/186487 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
