nico wrote: > Personally, I didn't feel it's necessary because `clang` is already present > in the path name - but we could come back and rename the directory sure. I'll > come back to address this.
`clang-sycl-linker` seem pretty similar name-wise and it's in clang/tools/clang-sycl-linker. Might be nice if things were consistent? (But I don't feel all that strongly.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185631 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
