AmrDeveloper wrote: > @AmrDeveloper There's a slightly expanded version of this implementation here > (#184011) that has been waiting to be merged. I think your change only adds a > catch test to this. Can you confirm this?
@andykaylor Ops, Yes, My goal was to add ref type, but I implemented ptr type info to be able to do that, I will wait until the other PR gets merged, then i will rebase and keep only init catch part https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
