SamrudhNelli wrote: > If its very simple and obvious to do, then I'd prefer to do it here (an > atomic change), since its still all clang-doc code. To be clear, I'm not > suggesting you change clang and the actual parser. I'm suggesting you modify > either our AST visitor or some of the info processing stages, like > serialization. But like I said, if its not simple and obvious how to do that, > it can be delayed. A TODO is a good policy for such cleanups. I'd use a > slightly more accurate message though, since you won't be modifying the > parser (or AST), just mildly processing the comments as we store them.
As per my understanding of the codebase, we use `parse()` provided by the AST library. And since `getComment` in Mapper.cpp returns a FullComment, I modified `visitTextComment()` in Serialize.cpp. Is that right? Could you let me know if there is a better point before this where I can trim() the comment, without altering the AST? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183085 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
