androm3da wrote: > I'm fine with this change. Not sure if there's a better fix available for > this. This change will guard the function definition but the call sites for > B0 will not work. Should consider renaming the function too?
Yeah - this solution is not as effective as I thought. Renaming should work, I'll do that instead. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184539 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
