lhames added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36806#848246, @hintonda wrote:
> It's just too bad llvm::cantFail() doesn't take an optional string. > But the code is cleaner, so I won't comment further. That's not a bad idea actually. Let me add an optional error message to cantFail for you. https://reviews.llvm.org/D36806 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
