llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> I have no idea how to test this, but this is what the current interpreter does. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184141.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (+2-2) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp index 70d3d80b806d1..eadeb900ec845 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp @@ -7292,8 +7292,8 @@ bool Compiler<Emitter>::visitDeclRef(const ValueDecl *D, const Expr *E) { // Try to lazily visit (or emit dummy pointers for) declarations // we haven't seen yet. const auto *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D); - if (!VD) - return this->emitDummyPtr(D, E); + if (!VD + return this->emitInvalid(E); // For C. if (!Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) { `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184141 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
