rsmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36501#836257, @rjmccall wrote:
> Yeah, I think having an internal C++ ABI version makes a lot more sense than > having a million different flags. Is there a reason to expose this as a knob > to users at all? I don't see any reason anyone would want to use this other than to restore the ABI to that of Clang <= 4, so an overall "clang ABI version" flag would seem reasonable to me. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D36501 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
