AaronBallman wrote: > > Is this a case where it makes more sense to make tablegen smarter about > > vector types (so this kind of mistake is caught and we don't decompose to > > less type information with `void *`) than to switch to `void *`? > > Marking as requesting changes given there's quite a few questions around > > this PR at the moment. > > If i understand correctly you are in favour of making `Vector<size, type> *` > style in tablegen which provides more information about type of pointer and > current `Vector<size, type *>` carries no semantic meaning by design. is that > correct?
Correct https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/182242 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
