Serosh-commits wrote:

> I can't give you a definitive answer to that, I'd have to try myself and see 
> what tests break if I do that. I think it's weird that the declaration 
> doesn't get marked as invalid but maybe that ends up being important, I don't 
> know yet.

@tbaederr I understand the hesitation since it might have side effects If you 
think the Sema fix is too risky  what alternative approach would you suggest 
for solving the crash let me know 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180261
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to