================
@@ -741,13 +743,41 @@ void SystemZAsmPrinter::emitInstruction(const 
MachineInstr *MI) {
   case SystemZ::EH_SjLj_Setup:
     return;
 
+  case SystemZ::LOAD_STACK_GUARD:
+    llvm_unreachable(
+        "LOAD_STACK_GUARD should have been eliminated by the DAG Combiner.");
+
+  case SystemZ::MOVE_STACK_GUARD:
+  case SystemZ::COMPARE_STACK_GUARD:
+    llvm_unreachable("MOVE_STACK_GUARD and COMPARE_STACK_GUARD should have "
+                     "been expanded by ExpandPostRAPseudo.");
+
+  case SystemZ::LARL:
+  case SystemZ::LGRL: {
+    auto &Op = MI->getOperand(1);
+    if (Op.isGlobal() && (Op.getGlobal()->getName() == "__stack_chk_guard"))
----------------
uweigand wrote:

Yes.  But only for the "global" case, this decision should still be make in the 
post-RA pass.  Not sure if it is better to make the PIC vs. non-PIC decision 
here or in post-RA ...

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169317
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to