arsenm wrote: > Or make clang to use the resource dir in case that ROCM_PATH doesn't contain > device libs.
I think this should be the opposite. ROCM_PATH should never overrule the resource directory. I think the search priority logic should be: 1. Explicit `--rocm-device-lib-path` 2. Resource directory contains libraries. This wins, ignore ROCM_PATH. 3. ROCM_PATH (or ignore it, though I'm not sure that's going to be easy to just do today) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177346 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
