=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================ @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ // function is irrelevant; and the unconditional path within the function is // trivial and wouldn't have any note tags anyway.) // -// I also attempted to implement this checker in Clang Tidy, but the AST -// matching is simply not powerful enough to express this "no branching on the -// path" relationship -- I would have needed to reinvent the wheel. +// However, the AST matching framework of Clang Tidy is not powerful enough to ---------------- necto wrote: ```suggestion // The AST matching framework of Clang Tidy is not powerful enough to ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175602 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
