necto wrote: > What do you think, what should we do about this? Shall we just land what I > have here, or explore how to generalise this or fix the technical debt in > this area?
I think this PR is an improvement, so I vote for landing it. The case I pointed out seems rather obscure, you can add a comment and a test case mentioning the limitation, but I don't think it should be a blocker for this PR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170887 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
