================
@@ -265,19 +265,19 @@ class Variadic {};
typedef Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 < 0}.b> >, S<(0 < 0),
Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]> > > > Variadic_t;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: use 'using' instead of 'typedef'
-// CHECK-FIXES: using Variadic_t = Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 < 0}.b>
>, S<(0 < 0), Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]> > > >;
+// CHECK-FIXES: using Variadic_t = Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 <
0}.b>>, S<(0 < 0), Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]>>>>;
typedef Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 < 0}.b> >, S<(0 < 0),
Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]> > > > Variadic_t, *Variadic_p;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: use 'using' instead of 'typedef'
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-2]]:103: warning: use 'using' instead of 'typedef'
-// CHECK-FIXES: using Variadic_t = Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 < 0}.b>
>, S<(0 < 0), Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]> > > >;
-// CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: using Variadic_p = Variadic_t*;
+// CHECK-FIXES: using Variadic_t = Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 <
0}.b>>, S<(0 < 0), Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]>>>>;
+// CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: using Variadic_p = Variadic<Variadic<int, bool, Q<T{0 <
0}.b>>, S<(0 < 0), Variadic<Q<b[0 < 0]>>>> *;
----------------
vbvictor wrote:
This new behavior seems like degradation to me and we shouldn't provide such
fix-its.
I guess these test cases were added because it's a common pattern and we should
preserve multi-level fixits
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174104
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
