malaperle added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894#830178, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894#829190, @malaperle wrote: > > > @Nebiroth I think it's OK to put this on hold until we make the "semantic" > > hover and figure out how to have both. From our perspective, this is going > > beyond parity of what we had before but it's seems like the right thing to > > do. > > > BTW, just noticed that VS Code shows the range reported by `findDefinitions` > when you hover over a symbol and holding Ctrl. > Would calling `findDefinitions` help you to do the same thing? That would > allow to get closer to feature parity with CDT without implementing semantic > hover in clangd. That looks very interesting, I had no idea. We'll have to try that. Thanks! https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
