keinflue wrote: > > Given that the change was made in a core issue - therefore allowing us to > > backport it, my inclination would be to remove the compatibility warnings > > all together and just emit a non-extension warning in all language modes. I > > suspect it would be more useful to users > > WDYT @shafik @erichkeane ? > > My notes say it was a DR, so back porting makes sense.
If I remove the compatibility warnings and instead use a non-extension warning under `-Wextra-semi`, how should I handle the diagnostic groups for `-Wc++11-extra-semi` and `Wc++98-compat-extra-semi`? Would they remain as groups, but unused by any diagnostic? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172209 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
