erichkeane added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35449#826381, @craig.topper wrote:
> @erichkeane are you ok with this code for now? I think validateCPUIs gives > you what you need at least for Sema support for target attribute. You'll > probably need to refactor the CG code to make your ifunc resolver. But I > think you need to do that for the existing feature code that's similar > anyway. And from our side conversation it sounds like you're not ready for > that yet. Thats correct. I think this is right based on what I currently understand, though you/I will likely need to make some additional modifications to support my features. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35449 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
