timon-ul wrote:

> https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1104#issuecomment-2833972488 a tidbit 
> from a previous investigation that may be relevant. It suggests that the 
> background indexer does skip parsing function bodies in some situations 
> (basically, in files that haven't changed since the last time they were 
> indexed), though it's not clear to me yet how that would be applicable here.

Tried also to change the behaviour of this by unconditionally indexing files, 
also did not work.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169742
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to