================
@@ -4002,8 +4012,11 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(const GlobalDecl 
GD, unsigned BuiltinID,
       Result = Builder.CreateBinaryIntrinsic(
           Ty->isSignedIntegerType() ? Intrinsic::smin : Intrinsic::umin, Op0,
           Op1, nullptr, "elt.min");
-    } else
-      Result = Builder.CreateMinNum(Op0, Op1, /*FMFSource=*/nullptr, 
"elt.min");
+    } else {
+      FastMathFlags FMF;
+      FMF.setNoSignedZeros(true);
----------------
nikic wrote:

I think `__builtin_elementwise_min` must be changed to use `minimumnum` 
semantics to be coherent now. The new `minnum` semantics are non-associative, 
so an elementwise minnum is no longer a well-defined operation. It would have 
to specify an explicit reduction order, which requires a different intrinsic 
design (see the signature differences between reduce.fadd and reduce.fmin).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113133
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to