arsenm wrote: > Hi, thanks for cleaning up :) I'll take a closer look/try to test this > against AdaptiveCpp, where we'd seen some issues with the builtin headers in > the past. A quick question already: is there any code gen differences to be > expected or did the ocml/nvptx builtins already map to the same LLVM > builtins? Cheers
It should be nearly the same. The biggest difference might be for logb/ilogb, since a larger expansion happens directly in clang now https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/171106 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
