t.p.northover added a comment. > I tended to keep function definitions in the class declaration unless it > caused additional includes to be necessary.
Was that for implementation simplicity, or part of some cunning design goal? A lot of these pairs look pretty header-heavy to me (especially given that we're overriding virtual functions so inlining is mostly impossible). https://reviews.llvm.org/D35701 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
