Prazek added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/Attr.td:2421
-def SelectAny : InheritableAttr, TargetSpecificAttr<TargetWindows> {
+def SelectAny : InheritableAttr, TargetSpecificAttr<TargetWindowsAndLinux> {
let Spellings = [Declspec<"selectany">, GCC<"selectany">];
----------------
davide wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > Prazek wrote:
> > > rnk wrote:
> > > > davide wrote:
> > > > > Prazek wrote:
> > > > > > majnemer wrote:
> > > > > > > selectany should work on targets other than "x86", "x86_64",
> > > > > > > "arm", "thumb", etc. I think it is only necessary to require that
> > > > > > > it be a COFF or ELF target.
> > > > > > Should we allow other OSes than Win32 and Linux?
> > > > > I guess everything ELF should be allowed.
> > > > Why not use weak_odr / linkonce_odr on MachO? Microsoft builds Office
> > > > for Mac and I suspect they use `__declspec(selectany)`.
> > > I think this is what would happen right now. The question is - should we
> > > warn about using declspec on macho? Beause not using comdat looks like
> > > "not supporting" it, but I am not sure about it.
> > I'm pretty sure weak_odr / linkonce_odr with ld64 on macho are the same as
> > having a comdat. LLVM didn't always have comdats, but it's supported inline
> > functions for a very long time. We should support selectany there.
> I agree with @rnk here.
So does it actually mean that we don't have any requirements for
declscpec(any)? It can run on every OS and target
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33852
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
