================
@@ -1302,15 +1302,14 @@ bool X86TargetInfo::hasFeature(StringRef Feature) const
{
// X86TargetInfo::hasFeature for a somewhat comprehensive list).
bool X86TargetInfo::validateCpuSupports(StringRef FeatureStr) const {
return llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(FeatureStr)
-#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY) .Case(STR, true)
-#define X86_MICROARCH_LEVEL(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY) .Case(STR, true)
+#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY, ABI_LEVEL) .Case(STR, true)
#include "llvm/TargetParser/X86TargetParser.def"
.Default(false);
}
static llvm::X86::ProcessorFeatures getFeature(StringRef Name) {
return llvm::StringSwitch<llvm::X86::ProcessorFeatures>(Name)
-#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY)
\
+#define X86_FEATURE_COMPAT(ENUM, STR, PRIORITY, ABI_VALUE)
\
----------------
mikolaj-pirog wrote:
I'm fine with both names -- I've picked ABI instead of API since it's low-level
information on how features are stored in a table for multiversion functions
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168750
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
