efriedma-quic wrote:

Has there been any further discussion about the semantics of 
llvm.aarch64.set.fpmr?  It looks like there was some discussion in #114248, but 
it wasn't ever really resolved.  It seems problematic to allow users to 
explicitly control the state at the IR level, as opposed to letting the 
compiler configure it in the backend.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165282
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to