cor3ntin wrote: > As a side note, I hate this. It really shouldn't be that hard to decide > whether producing a nan is UB or not. I don't think following GCC is _that_ > important in this case. But I'll let someone else decide.
I think we really should go to WG14/WG21/SC22 before even considering anything in this space. It has a lot of ramifications: - NTTPs and mangling - Signaling NaNs - Trial evaluation - How and when NaNs propagate - Impact on standard libraries - Whether it make sense to allow in constant expressions something that might otherwise be caught by some sanitizer https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167892 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
