https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
I’m not convinced this is the right approach; what if we have e.g.
```
template <typename ... T>
void foo(T... Params) {
([&]{ Params ?: 1; }(), ...);
}
```
We still crash on this and I’m sure `commonExpr` would still be pack-dependent
in this case, but we don’t want this to become invalid.
I wonder if we should just delete the assertion in
`computeDependence(OpaqueValueExpr*)`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164019
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
