AaronBallman wrote: > Is there a reason why a new attribute name can't be used instead? Like say > `malloc_span` and `alloc_size_span`. This should make easier to keep things > working when trying with say `__has_attribute` and older clang/gcc and you > don't need to hard code the exact version of clang/gcc where the support was > added. I know GCC's malloc attribute added an extra argument which is hard to > test for except via a feature test via an autoconf like but I feel like that > was a mistake [one which we need to live with now] (I didn't think of the > issue back when GCC added that support nor I responded to the review back > then either).
I think that's a reasonable idea; I'd be happy with `malloc_span` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165433 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
