dzhidzhoev wrote: > I think it sounds roughly plausible - the perf issue I wouldn't /expect/ to > be a problem, there's probably a lot more types (in a full debug info build > at least) than functions (hmm, well, actually hard to say - guess it could go > either way) & I guess it's well enough optimized it hopefully won't show up > in profiles or the like.
Let's try simpler solution https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165032. If it works out, we won't need to support different llvm::Functions referring to the same DISubprogram in DwarfDebug. Uniquing DISubprograms may be a nice idea still. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142166 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
