AaronBallman wrote: > I'm not sure how to proceed here. A 16% build time increase (as mentioned > up-thread) is very significant for us. > > @AaronBallman do you have any thoughts here?
16% is a bigger performance regression than I think we were anticipating. > I did see that #61811 mention "We should get performance data for that change > and give feedback to WG21 if it looks like this is going to have a > significant performance impact." So it sounds like this was somewhat > anticipated? I think we expected a performance hit, but more like 1-3%, not 10+%; that's significant enough that if we can't solve it, it should be feedback given to WG21 because that feels like too much of a regression to swallow. CC @cor3ntin (it may be a while before he responds, the dev conference is next week and WG21 meetings are the week after). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161671 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
