efriedma-quic wrote:

I guess my remaining question is if -fno-omit-frame-pointer should imply 
-mreserve-frame-pointer-reg by default. I can see why you'd want it off by 
default for gcc compatibility.  But I suspect most users enabling frame 
pointers would be happier if it was on.  The primary reason people enable frame 
pointers is to use frame chains to compute a stack trace, and clobbering the 
frame pointer breaks that.

CC @pinskia

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163775
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to