yicuixi wrote: > I think emitting two diagnostics is fine (one for the underlying type and one > for the empty enum) because they are separate extensions. But I think it's a > bit odd that we claim the underlying type is a Microsoft extension rather > than a C23 extension -- that seems to be a preexisting issue which could be > handled in a separate PR: https://godbolt.org/z/sMhGoE3qq
SGTM, I'd prefer to fix that in a separate patch. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159981 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
