gtbercea added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29905#800416, @Hahnfeld wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34888#799576, @gtbercea wrote:
>
> > Does this also include the fixes in the following revision?
> >
> > https://reviews.llvm.org/D29905
>
>
> Sorry, I wasn't aware of this revision and thought that it had long been 
> committed. I just verified that the bug referenced in the summary is also 
> fixed by my patch in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34888. However, I can't 
> comment on whether this patch is still needed. Sorry for the conflicts if 
> yes...
>
> You probably should commit your patches earlier, you currently have 10 
> accepted revisions that have not yet been committed. This will also avoid 
> complicated rebases and so on.


No problem at all! I am trying to commit the rest of the patches. Currently 
waiting on one more patch to get approved that will unlock the rest. I do 
encourage you to review/comment on it: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34784 :)


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D29905



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D29905: [Op... Jonas Hahnfeld via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D29905... Gheorghe-Teodor Bercea via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to