svenvh wrote: > For simplicity, can we revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D92231 and don't > always define the feature macro in headers?
Not really, reverting that does not solve the underlying issue and would be a step backwards regarding moving header-only extensions out of the Clang internals. If I understand correctly, the underlying issue is that historically the `SPIR` target had become the equivalent of "enable all known extensions". Perhaps that's something we'd want to reconsider, but that's a separate discussion. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162055 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
