================ ---------------- ymand wrote:
I'd be interested in other clang member opinions as to whether this is the right location for these matchers. As much as they are general, their intended use/need is still the StatusOr model, so co-locating them with the model code might be more appropriate. I suspect AST matchers maintainers are not looking to add matcher support for a wide variety of (common?) library types. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160953 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
