arphaman added a comment. Ah, I see, so this is more of a stylistic warning rather than "suspicious" use one.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34810#795926, @rtrieu wrote: > What is the reason to exclude void expressions now? For the function case, > it is more consistent to warn on all function calls since we can't determine > if a function returns void just by looking at the call site. We've had an issue with -Wcomma adoption internally and have thought that this was a bug. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D34810 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
