Keenuts wrote:
> We should have tests for some cases like:
>
> ```
> struct S {
> float4 f0 : SV_Position;
> float4 f1; // error due to missing semantic here!
> };
>
> float4 main(S s) { }
>
> // Semantics on return objects are required but not supported yet (right?)
> float4 main2(float4 p : SV_POSITION, float4 f) { } // error for missing
> semantic on `f`
> ```
Yes, I'll add several sema checks now that those are validated in sema.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159047
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
