vbvictor wrote: > But do we want to mention the change twice in the change log? In another PR > we are only mentioning the breaking change in the breaking changes section, > not again in the improvement's section.
I initially thought to duplicate entries just in case if someone would read only clang-tidy part. I think it's better to have in both https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157306 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
