chandlerc added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/test/Other/new-pm-thinlto-defaults.ll:157 ; CHECK-PRELINK-O-NEXT: Running pass: GlobalOptPass -; CHECK-PRELINK-O-NEXT: Running pass: NameAnonGlobalPass ; CHECK-POSTLINK-O-NEXT: Running pass: PassManager<{{.*}}Module{{.*}}> ---------------- tejohnson wrote: > Can this be changed to check for the pass being added in its new location, > since it should still be invoked somewhere for ThinLTO? If this change means > it is no longer added under options to set up the thinlto pipeline via opt, > I'd prefer that we go back to adding this to the pipeline in > buildThinLTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline in the non-O0 case. It seems somewhat unfortunate to have a *semantic* requirement on a particular placement of this pass inside of the pipeline... Especially when the semantics pretty much only stem from C++. For example, an a language without anonymous globals, you might not want this pass when doing ThinLTO. Note that you can exactly model the thing Clang is doing with opt even after this: opt -passes='thinlto-pre-link<O3>,name-anon-globals' https://reviews.llvm.org/D34728 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits