jhuber6 wrote: > Thanks, that's definitely a significant step closer. I've given this a more > detailed review. Unfortunately, writing builtins with custom type-checking > can be a little tricky because of the range of languages we support in Clang. > It mostly just involves making calls that you're supposed to be making anyway > and checking for dependent types, but it's something every builtin needs to > be doing.
Thanks, hopefully this is closer to what you had in mind now. It's definitely a lot of work to do all this type checking manually but I have a much better idea of what the edge cases we check for are. Appreciate the thorough reviews. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160185 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
