jcranmer-intel wrote: I don't remember the example off-hand, but there was a fast-math transform I wanted at one point that needed a flag on `fptoui`.
> I don't think we should do this until we have freed up the necessary flag > space to also support uitofp as well. I can see an argument for doing `fptoui` and to `fptosi` without the inverses, but agreed that `sitofp` without `uitofp` is a bad idea. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160475 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
