mehdi_amini added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24644#792168, @fhahn wrote:
> I'd like to fix PR22999 and was wondering if you think adding a > function-section attribute to the IR would be a viable solution? > > When doing LTO, we could add the same function-section to each function in a > module in the IRLinker. @mehdi_amini did you think something like that when > suggesting using attributes? Not sure how this would work? How do you codegen half of the functions with function-section but not all? How is the backend supposed to behave if it starts with a function that isn't decorated with this attribute, then move to one that is, and finally proceed with one that isn't? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D24644 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
