NoQ added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34102#788138, @zaks.anna wrote:
> I think it's better to have inconsistency than having checks applicable to > windows in a package named portability.unix. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34102#788138, @zaks.anna wrote: > If there will be checks that need to be in portability and only used for > unix, we could create that sub-package later on. Sounds good to me, will commit then. Still, more reasons to have aliases or tags. https://reviews.llvm.org/D34102 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
