dexonsmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34574#791158, @rsmith wrote:
> Should we also remove the recently-added availability attributes in libc++ > too? If I'm using a recent libc++ and providing my own aligned allocation > functions, we shouldn't reject attempts to call those aligned allocation > functions. Ugh; maybe. There's `-D_LIBCPP_DISABLE_AVAILABILITY` already, but that's too big a hammer (disables //all// of the markup). https://reviews.llvm.org/D34574 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
